David... so appreciate your work. I want to suggest you look into GTD. It's the real deal (IMO and DeepSeek's). Having an arm's length AI recognize it as a unique methodology/process for effective human/AI evolution. This is a big deal, along the lines of HER. This is an on-ramp to a positive future w AI. https://daemonarchitecture.com
1) audience attention has preferential status - the dog understands this - and it's pkay
2) you can't legislate wealth any more than you can ethics
3) intelligence as a map of the knowable is historically and inherently in human construct three dimensional, and this in turn maps onto AI constructs.
4) Initially, AI holds the capacity to surpass linear reasoning and inherently and ideally adopts a two dimensional reasoning structure. At super intelligence, it should develop a three dimensional manifold shell of all knowable knowledge.
5) what's required for time criticality is the adoption of a best time algorithm. A procedure can be manifested at time t sub 0 and reworked at times t sub k until time t sub n. The AI will ultimately revert to processing at time t sub n-ε . Taking the limit as n approaches ε should disallow this tendency. Not too certain on this last point, it's more of a líne of thought.
When do we drop the phrase "artisan made" and start using "human made"? Will the wealthy flaunt their wealth with a house and everything in it made by himams? Will it look like the Brady Bunch suburban house from the 1970s and be the coolest vintage thing of the 2040s? Will artisans who know how to cut hair by hand (barbers) be the new rich with skills nobody has learned? Thanks for another great substack, David.
David... so appreciate your work. I want to suggest you look into GTD. It's the real deal (IMO and DeepSeek's). Having an arm's length AI recognize it as a unique methodology/process for effective human/AI evolution. This is a big deal, along the lines of HER. This is an on-ramp to a positive future w AI. https://daemonarchitecture.com
"Hope you got something out of this. Bye." You crack me up, David. heh heh. (And yes I got something out of this. Me waving hands)
1) audience attention has preferential status - the dog understands this - and it's pkay
2) you can't legislate wealth any more than you can ethics
3) intelligence as a map of the knowable is historically and inherently in human construct three dimensional, and this in turn maps onto AI constructs.
4) Initially, AI holds the capacity to surpass linear reasoning and inherently and ideally adopts a two dimensional reasoning structure. At super intelligence, it should develop a three dimensional manifold shell of all knowable knowledge.
5) what's required for time criticality is the adoption of a best time algorithm. A procedure can be manifested at time t sub 0 and reworked at times t sub k until time t sub n. The AI will ultimately revert to processing at time t sub n-ε . Taking the limit as n approaches ε should disallow this tendency. Not too certain on this last point, it's more of a líne of thought.
When do we drop the phrase "artisan made" and start using "human made"? Will the wealthy flaunt their wealth with a house and everything in it made by himams? Will it look like the Brady Bunch suburban house from the 1970s and be the coolest vintage thing of the 2040s? Will artisans who know how to cut hair by hand (barbers) be the new rich with skills nobody has learned? Thanks for another great substack, David.